Bolivia Election Sends Warning to U.S. Diplomacy, IWU Professor Says
December 23, 2005
BLOOMINGTON, Ill. – The election in Bolivia this week of a populist candidate for
president who campaigned on promises to defy U.S. anti-drug efforts in his country
is a “warning shot across the diplomatic bow of the United States,” according to a
political scientist at Illinois Wesleyan University who has monitored previous South
American elections with the Carter Center.
It was significant that even the defeated candidate, Jorge Quiroga, who received his
college education in the United States, sharply downplayed his ties to the U.S. during
a final debate with the victorious Evo Morales, said Associate Professor of Political
Science Frank Boyd.
“I think that gives us a good idea of the kind of damage that has been done to the
United States’ reputation in the region and how there are considerable domestic political
benefits to be gained when Latin American leaders assume an antagonistic posture toward
the United States,” Boyd said.
- Hear an interview with Boyd on Minnesota Public Radio.
- Read a Newsday article about Moralez quoting Boyd.
Boyd said the United States has strongly promoted but not adequately supported the
eradication of coca crops in an effort to stem cocaine supplies. The U.S.-sponsored
policy has not provided sufficient alternatives for the poor Bolivian farmers, who
also grow the crop legally for local uses such as chewing and brewing into tea. Morales,
himself a coca farmer, campaigned on a socialist platform that included nationalizing
Bolivia’s natural gas production and reversing the U.S.-backed crusade against coca.
Morales has ties to leftist leaders including Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Fidel Castro
While Morales’ views about coca drew headlines, to Boyd the key issue is that “Bolivia
represents a failure of diplomacy. The Bush administration, until the last year or
so, seemed to view diplomacy as an episodic activity designed to achieve a discrete
policy goal. To be effective, diplomacy must concentrate on maintaining long-term
international relationships with allies and other countries.
“President Bush has shown little interest in the world outside of Iraq. And so, though
(former and current secretaries of state) Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice are very
skilled diplomats, their attention and energy has been focused almost exclusively
on the Middle Eastern region,” Boyd said. He added that the United States is likely
to spend much more time repairing relationships with South American countries if it
doesn’t engage with them soon.
“The real disaster scenario is for Bolivia to break up, and that’s not an unthinkable
possibility, because it’s a country that’s divided sharply along regional lines” between
the poverty-stricken western plateau and business centers rich with natural gas resources
in the east, Boyd said. “It is noteworthy that the Peruvian stock market plummeted
in the days following the Bolivian election. Clearly, the surrounding countries recognize
that a destabilized Bolivia on their borders is not a good thing.”
Boyd met previous Bolivian President Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada in La Paz and when
Lozada visited Illinois Wesleyan in 2003. Lozada reported that he had pleaded with
President Bush to intervene in Bolivia before the situation there worsened. Lozada
and his successor each were later ousted from office amid protests fueled by inequality
and poverty. Morales is the first indigenous president to win election in Bolivia,
where previous rulers were of European descent.
Boyd said Morales was able to demonize Sanchez de Lozada and his successor, Carlos
Mesa, and their economic policies by associating them with the United States.
“Populist leaders like Morales are able to identify a cluster of policies and political
relationships – free markets, close diplomatic ties to the U.S. – and package that
with populist rhetoric to suggest that the U.S. and international economies are benefiting
at the expense of Bolivian citizens.
“What will be very interesting will be how and if (Morales) moderates his populist
rhetoric, because now he’s got to govern,” Boyd said. “To date, he has shown few signs
of moderation. In fact, on his recent trip to Venezuela, President Morales referred
to Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and himself as an ‘axis of good’ in obvious reference
to President Bush’s use of the phrase ‘axis of evil.’”
To speak with Boyd about Bolivia, contact Ann Aubry at (309)556-3181.