This section gives some consequences of a sequence having a limit. These results are useful sometimes to show that a sequence does not converge.
PROOF:
Suppose thatis a convergent sequence. Then there is a N such that if n>N we have |an-L|<1 thus there are at most N terms not in the interval [L-1,L+1]. The sequence is then bounded above by the largest element of
and bounded below by its smallest element.
Because of this proposition we know that if a sequence is not bounded ten it does not converge. We can also show that a sequence does not converge by demonstrating two subsequences which tend to different values.
A subsequence is thus a sequence with some of the terms left out.
PROOF:
Supposeand b is a subsequence of a, say using
. Given
there is an N such that if n>N then
. Let M be the smallest natural number such that
then if m>M we have
. Thus
as well.
PROOF:
Ifthe proposition is easy: suppose the limit is
. Pick b0=a0. Next let f(n) be the least m with am>bn-1. The resulting subsequence is monotone increasing. A similar argument produces a monotone decreasing subsequence if the limit is
. Note that if a sequence an is unbounded, then it will have a subsequence which converges to either
.
Suppose
is bounded. Let
and
. Then
since there are an infinite number of natural numbers
for each n, and thus either
or
or both. Thus at least one of U and L must be infinite.
Suppose U is infinite. Then it is nonempty and we have assumed it is bounded above, so it must have a least upper bound u. We construct a monotone nondecreasing subsequence of an converging to u. Let b0 be the first ak with
. We define f(k+1)=m where m is the smallest element of U larger than f(k) which has
. This gives us a monotone nondecreasing subsequence of an.
A similar argument using the greatest lower bound of L to produce a monotone nonincreasing sequence will work if it is L which is infinite.