Next: Set-Indexed operations
Up: Operations on sets
Previous: Operations on sets
Definition 16
Let

and

be sets. Then the intersection
Definition 17
Let

and

be sets. Then the union
Definition 18
Let

and

be sets. Then

iff
.
Notice that
if and only if both
and
. The definitions of
and
also make it immediate that
,
,
, and
. Other close ties are given by
(6 Points )
Definition 19
Let

and

be sets. Then
Definition 20
Let

and

be sets. Then
The projections

and

take the pair

to

and

respectively.
Proposition 20
Let

and

be sets and let

and

be functions. Then there is a unique function

such that

and

.
(3 Points )
Definition 21
Let

and

be sets. Then the disjoint union
The injection maps are

with

and

with

.
Proposition 21
Let

and

be sets and let

and

be functions. Then there is a unique function

such that

and

.
(3 Points )
Definition 22
The symmetric difference of sets

and

is
Proposition 22
The set operations

and

can be expressed using

and

.
(2 Points )
Proposition 23
Show that

and

as defined above are neither associative nor commutative and have no identity elements.
(3 Points )
There is a sense in which the preceding proposition misrepresents the situation. We can weaken associativity, commutativity and identity so that they will (sort of) hold for
and
:
Proposition 24
We can salvage associativity, commutativity and identity for

and

by asking for isomorphism rather than equality.
(3 Points )
Some further propositions relate union, intersection, Cartesian product and disjoint sum. For these either find a proof or a counterexample and salvage by indicating an appropriate direction for a subset relationship:
Proposition 25
(2 Points )
Proposition 26
(2 Points )
Proposition 27

(3 Points )
Proposition 28

(3 Points )
Proposition 29

(3 Points )
Proposition 30

(3 Points )
Next: Set-Indexed operations
Up: Operations on sets
Previous: Operations on sets
Larry Stout
2001-08-17