Next: Integers: Extending a system
Up: Numbers
Previous: Basic Divisibility Theory
The following all follow from the third axiom in the definition of
and are equivalent:
- Mathematical Induction: If a property
holds for
and if the implication
holds, then
holds for all
.
- Strong induction: If a property
holds for
and if the implication
holds, then
holds for all
.
- Well ordering of
: Any non-empty subset
has a least element.
If a mathematician uses ``...'' in the middle of an informal argument, it is a good bet that there is an induction argument called for in a more formal proof.
The following examples use one of these three proof techniques:
Proposition 93
Given that

,

, and the product rule
we get

for all

.
(4 Points )
Proposition 94
The product of n numbers may be grouped any way you please.
(4 Points )
Proposition 95

.
(4 Points )
Proposition 96

.
(4 Points )
Proposition 97

.
(4 Points )
Proposition 98

.
(4 Points )
Proposition 99
Every natural number

is either a prime or is the product of primes.
(4 Points )
Theorem 100 (Division Algorithm)
If

and

are positive natural numbers, then there are natural numbers

and

with

and

.
(4 Points )
Theorem 101 (Euclidean Algorithm)
If

and

are positive natural numbers, then the greatest common divisor of

and

can be expressed as

for some integers

and

.
(4 Points )
Corollary 102
If

and the largest common divisor of

and

is 1, then

.
(2 Points )
Corollary 103
Any natural number

has a prime factorization which is unique up to the order of the factors.
(4 Points )
Next: Integers: Extending a system
Up: Numbers
Previous: Basic Divisibility Theory
Larry Stout
2001-08-17