Course Description:
Food is a common need of all living creatures; it links humans
to other animals and the environment and it helps to shape our identities
as individuals, communities, and nations. Given the importance of food
in our lives, in this writing course we will consider its effects on our
individual identities, our national identity and on our future identity.
We will talk, listen, read and write about who controls what we eat, how
family rituals define who we are and how gender affects our food decisions.
We will also define the role of fast food in shaping our contemporary national
identity and debate the role of genetically modified foods and their implications
for how we eat and how we live.
Course Objectives:
In this writing course we will think and read critically about
issues regarding food and identity. As we explore alternatives to our preconceived
notions of the role of food in our lives, we will develop our capacity
for analytical thinking, articulate our ideas in verbal and written contexts
and critique our own essays as well as other studentsâ essays. We
will become practiced in many of the techniques, values, and customs of
an academic community: information technology research skills, intellectual
integrity, peer-collaboration, tolerance, and academic responsibility.
One of my goals is to help you grow as a liberal arts student and as
a scholarly writer.
Another goal is that, ten years from now, you continue to consider
what you eat, how it affects you and your environment and the local and
global communities in which you live.
Required texts:
Nestle, Marion. Safe Food. Bacteria, Biotechnology and Bioterrorism.
Berkeley:
University of California Press, 2003.
Rosen, Leonard J. and Laurence Behrens. The Allyn & Bacon Handbook.
Fourth Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
Schlosser, Eric. Fast Food Nation. The Dark Side of the All-American
Meal. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2001.
Tyler, Anne. Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant. New York, Ballantine,
1982.
Additional articles distributed during the semester
Throughout the semester there will also be opportunities to attend lectures
related to our Gateway theme outside of class. These are great opportunities
to continue exploring how food is part of our identity.
Expectations and evaluation
Class participation. This is an assignment-centered course so
it is imperative that you come to class and that you come on time and prepared
to think, discuss, and write. You will benefit from this course (indeed
any course) in direct proportion to the effort you put into it. You should
always have writing utensils, paper, the Allyn & Bacon Handbook,
and the reading assigned for the week. I will make note of the quality
of student participation. You can be absence from class two times without
any excuse and it will not affect your participation grade. However, you
will receive "0" for any absence thereafter. Excused absences, verified
with a doctorâs note, with a note from the IWU nurse, or a note from
the Dean of Studentâs office, will not count against your participation
grade. Students should note, however, that in-class assignments cannot
be made up and that all written work is due on the date listed in the syllabus.
In other words, the assignment should make it to class even if the student
does not. I will accept late work (submitted any time after I collect assignments
in class) but it will lose a full letter grade for each day that it is
late, effective immediately after I collect papers.
Grading scale for participation:
A: Extremely active, thoughtful participation in all class
activities. Frequent, insightful contributions to discussion, willingness
to take intellectual risks and argue your ideas; open-mindedness about
alternate views; respectful treatment of other members of the class; heroic
effort on revisions and informal writings.
B: Regular, thoughtful participation in all activities. Regular, but
not frequent contributions to discussion of consistently high quality,
or frequent contributions which range from fair to good; better-than-average
level of intellectual ambition, open-mindedness and respect for others;
above average level of effort put into revisions and informal writings
C: Average or uneven participation. Consistent attentiveness and preparedness
but infrequent contributions to discussion or regular contributions of
only fair quality, combined with average level of ambition and effort;
or above average effort on class work combined with near-silence in class
discussions. In general you did only the minimum required, but no less.
D: Below average participation. Near silence in class and minimal effort
put into other work or more than occasional inattentiveness or lack of
preparation, or occasional behavior which is disruptive or disrespectful
to other members of the class.
F: Unacceptable participation. Regularly missing activities or coming
to class unprepared or frequent inattentiveness and lack of preparation,
or frequent behavior which is disruptive or disrespectful to other members
of the class.
Formal Writing. You will write five essays. The first essay
(2-4 pages) will not count toward your final grade. It will provide me
with a writing sample from you, and it will provide you with a sense of
how I grade. THe following three essays will be 3-5 pages in length.The
fifth formal writing assignment is a research paper, 6-8 pages in length.
For this you will submit an introduction with thesis, rough outline and
bibliography in addition to a draft and final version.
All papers should be double-spaced, with 1" margins all around, a legible
12-point font, and page numbers at the bottom of the page (except the first
page). Title each paper and be sure your name appears in either top corner
of the first page. Consistently document all sources (Chapter 37 in Allyn
& Bacon offers the most common systems of documentation).
Due dates for Formal
Essay topics.
September 4 Essay 1 Due
September 16 Essay 2, bring to class
October 7 Essay 3, bring to class
October 28 Essay 4, bring to class
November 18 Essay 5, intro, thesis, bilbiography
November 20 Essay 5, bring to class
Grading Formal Writing Assignments:
A: This is work you are proud of. Beyond conveying a solid
understanding of the topic, the essay is further distinguished by valuable
insights, careful analysis, or exceptional exposition. The high quality
content and its clean presentation enable others to learn from it. The
essay has a strong engaging thesis that is supported by coherent organization,
persuasive arguments, and precise expression. The essay is free of mechanical,
and grammatical errors. The voice and style make for smooth reading and
enhance the effectiveness of the essay in conveying your thoughts. Wow!
B: You are happy with this work. Maybe you surprised yourself with what
you were able to learn or produce. The essay has a strong thesis that is
significant, analytical, and unified. Although the thesis is supported
by good organization and argument, maybe these aspects of the essay have
minor weaknesses; or there are minor problems with tone, voice, or style
that get in the way of a clear exposition of your thoughts. The essay is
almost free of mechanical and grammatical errors.
C: This is successful work you feel good about; however, you did not
demonstrate more than a basic understanding of the topic, or were careless
in organizing and presenting your thoughts, or did not take enough time
to do justice to the topic in terms of depth or breadth, or were careless
with editing and proofreading. The essay has a thesis, but it lacks development.
Although the essay does convey your thoughts, its organization, or arguments
fail to support the thesis fully. Or perhaps there are numerous problems
with mechanics or style.
D/F: This work was probably a waste of your time. The essay lacks a
clear thesis, or has serious or numerous problems with organization, argument,
expression, mechanics, or style, and has no virtues to offset these shortcomings.
The essay has at least one severe problem that reduces its effectiveness.
Informal Writing. Writing drives thinking; our multitude
of informal writings will serve to discover, question, complicate and clarify
our thoughts. Typically this writing moves in unanticipated directions.
These exploratory writings will include freewriting, letters, journal entries,
peer-review, pre-discussion questions, mid-discussion responses, expressing
confusion, summary in-class writing, imaginary dialogues, imaginary interviews,
metaphor games, glossing, mapping, and other forms of written expression.
They will be written both in class and out of class. Place all informal
writings together (in a folder, binder, or whatever works for you). I will
periodically collect them at the time they are written and will review
all of them at the end of each unit.
Grading Informal Writing Assignments: These assignments will
not be judged on things like spelling, organization, and grammar. However,
I expect quality work and will look for evidence that you are thinking
seriously about concepts you are writing about. Your work should show that
you have read the assignment. Your work should show that you are thinking
and studying. The best informal writings will be interesting for someone
else to read because they show how you are grappling with ideas.
Informal writings will be graded on the check system. In previous classes
this informal grading system has worked for students; the check system
gives you a feel for how you are doing.
Portfolio: A portfolio is a systematic collection of the materials
that you have written and revised over the course of the semester. It will
begin with a thoughtful and critical assessment of your own writing, include
drafts and final revisions of all formal writing assignments, and other
informal writing assignments.
The assessment is a 2-3 page typed cover letter that describes and analyzes
the gathered materials. Cover letters should address two main areas: 1.
Student's progress as a writer over the course of the semester. What areas
of writing did the student try to improve? How successful were those efforts?
What areas of the studentâs writing still need work? 2. Evolution
of the studentâs thinking about the topic of the course. What did
the student believe about food and identity (both personal and national)
at the beginning of the course? How (if at all) did those beliefs change
as the course progressed?
Plagiarism: Plagiarism is the use of another person's words,
ideas, thoughts, or opinions without acknowledging their source. It does
not matter if the source is verbal, visual, textual, formal, or informal,
whenever we use another person's ideas, explicitly or as tacit inspiration
for our own thinking, we are obligated to acknowledge the source. It does
not matter if our use is as a direct quotation, paraphrasing, or significant
revision, wherever there is a shred of another personâs ideas, we
must acknowledge the source. Honesty in this matter is a practice of respect
and accountability, and it facilitates understanding the development of
ideas over time.
Plagiarism is not tolerated in this class or anywhere at this university.
The first instance of plagiarism will result in an automatic grade of "F"
and a report to the assistant provost. Further instances of plagiarism
can result in more serious consequences including dismissal. If you are
unsure about your use of another person's ideas, or the proper way to acknowledge
it, see a professor to discuss your question before you submit any work.
It is better to be safe than sorry. Professors will welcome questions about
plagiarism and the opportunity to help you understand your responsibility
with regard to it.
An academic environment encourages and thrives on the sharing and integrating
of many individuals' ideas. This sharing is the purpose of any intellectual
community. A strong opposition to plagiarism is not meant to subdue the
sharing of ideas--it is meant to insure that the sharing is open, honest,
respectful, and constructive. Scholarship thrives when based on cooperation
and openness--not competitiveness and deceit. See the IWU student handbook
for more information on plagiarism and ethics.
(This section on plagiarism was generously shared by Paul Kehle and
comes from his 2001 Gateway syllabus.)
Grading Scale: Your grade in this course will be determined in
large part by the written work you produce. Your written work reflects
how you are able to comprehend, analyze, and communicate the topics we
study. This course seeks to develop these skills. If you ever have questions
about how I perceive your work in this class, please arrange to talk with
me.
| Participation |
15% |
|
A |
93-100 |
C+ |
77-79 |
| 4 Formal Writing Assignments |
60% |
|
A- |
90-92 |
C |
73-76 |
| Many Informal Writing Assignments |
15% |
|
B+ |
87-89 |
C- |
70-72 |
| Portfolio |
10% |
|
B |
83-86 |
D |
60-69 |
| |
|
|
B- |
80-82 |
F |
0-59 |
|