![]() |
|
Why is it that multitalented students are attracted to us and why do they seem to thrive here? |
From the President's Desk
This letter appeared in the Winter 2006 issue of the Illinois Wesleyan University Magazine.
This is the first of what will be regular communications from me in the Illinois Wesleyan University Magazine. In these brief letters I will share with you my views on issues facing our University, update you on major initiatives, or discuss accomplishments by our students, faculty, and staff.
As you know, our University prides itself on being a welcoming academic community for students with multiple talents and interests. In the finest tradition of the liberal arts, we appeal to students who are broadly curious, creative, and intellectually passionate.
Why is it that multitalented students are attracted to us and why do they seem to thrive here? In my view it is because they are not forced to make choices. We do not push them into limiting their options. They are not rushed into decisions about majors or careers. Instead, we encourage our students to pursue their intellectual passions, curiosity, and creativity in ways that are most meaningful to them. For that reason, the campus is filled with students who find ways to express their diverse interests through the curriculum and through the co-curriculum. I see examples of this every day:
Simply put, our students come to us because they have a passion for learning and growth. The important outcomes for our graduates are measured in the successes - both personal and vocational - that they enjoy in life.
I cannot help but think about the richness of these experiences in light of calls across the country for colleges and universities to become more accountable for the quality of education they provide. The most recent example comes from the Spellings Commission, which was convened by U.S. Department of Education Secretary Margaret Spellings. Among the recommendations recently forwarded by this group was a call for national student achievement testing that would allow comparison of results across institutions.
On the surface this seems to be a reasonable proposal, and I favor universities providing information to prospective students, parents, alumni, and friends on the impact of the undergraduate experience. Whoever considers such data, however, should bear in mind that a student's education has multiple dimensions. It would be mistake to reduce the assessment of the collegiate experience to what can be measured on a standardized test. Such misguided efforts will overlook the concerted efforts of universities to provide opportunities that stimulate the imagination, creativity, and civic engagement necessary to solve the problems of an increasingly diverse and complicated world.